YOUNG SPIFFY - DJ NOIZE - HOSTED BY S.L.I.M
CLICK THE PIC & DOWNLOAD YA COPY NOW!
1
Read more
HIM vs. HER - REPO MAN REVIEW!!
HER OFFICAL REVIEW
“Can’t pay for your house? The bank takes it. Can’t pay for your car? The bank takes it. Can’t pay for your liver? Well, that’s where I come in."
The movie is set in the future (near future) and people no longer have to wait on a transplant list to obtain organs because science has created artificial organs. A company called The Union sells the organs, the way that McDonald's sells you a double Cheeseburger, except the chesseburger would be the price of a Ferrari. If payments are made late or not made at all, The Union sends repo men to collect the organs, by any means possible. LITERALLY.
After a repo-gone-wrong, Remy (Jude Law), ends up with an artificial heart and no longer has the ‘heart’ to slice people open. Remy’s best friend Jake (Forrest Whitaker) thinks he’s just in a slump and will get back on his feet in no time, but that’s not the case, and Remy falls behind on his payments and has a new found respect for people he has to repo.
The film is an edge-of-your-seat thrill ride and even has some humorous moments. It is also graphic and has plenty of blood and gore to boot, so if you have a queasy stomach, I would advise skipping this film (perhaps see The Bounty Hunter instead. LOL). Theres even a twist that you cant see coming!
In simple terms THIS MOVIE ROCKS! (ONE OF THE BEST OF 2010 SO FAR...)
4.5 out of 5 Stars
HIS B. FREE REVIEW
"ONE OF THE BEST OF 2010" is she on crack????? It was cool, but i wouldn't go that far!
It started off pretty cool, then about 15 to 20 minutes into the movie just seemed to stall out. I found myself wanting to drift off, it only lasted for about 5 minutes then it was back to the action!!!
The plot was cool, there were some interesting plot twist that pop up [i won't spoil it] and some very oddly placed sexual scenes but all in all it was a very entertaining flick.
I give it 3 out of 5 wacka flocka flames (stars)
IN THEATERS NOW!
0
After talking to a few friends about the new TP movie I decided to see what others had to say about it....
The Internet Movie Database (IMDB.com) had a break down of a few choice reviews,
As is the usual case with Tyler Perry movies, Why Did I get Married Too? wasn’t screened for critics. It might as well have been, since the reviews turned out to have been not all that bad — and in some cases were pretty good. In her review in the New York Daily News, Elizabeth Weitzman wrote: “Perry doesn’t take any artistic risks; he’s got a formula, and sticks to it. The point, as always, is to remind viewers that they aren’t the only ones dealing with a straying spouse, a desperate job search, a grievous personal loss. He offers solace in familiarity, relief in low comedy, and comfort in platitudes about love and trust. And who are we to question his logic? The man has built an empire by giving his audience the emotional uplift it wants, critics be damned.” That’s pretty much the theme of a lot of reviews. Cheryl V. Jackson in the Chicago Sun-Times remarked, “There’s something oddly comforting about the familiarity of a Perry flick.” Wesley Morris in the Boston Globe indicated that he didn’t mind paying $11 to see the movie (instead of getting a free invitation from the studio). “I got $111 of drama. That’s Broadway value. But very little on the stage — not even one of Perry’s own plays — has had me sweating, crying, rolling my eyes, and sucking my teeth like this. The movie is 120 minutes of emotional Stairmaster. It’s so exhausting, in fact, that Perry himself has to climb off early, ending the movie without really finishing it.” On the other hand, Rafer Guzmán in Newsday concludes: “Once again, the movie feels amateurish, and not only because Perry tends to shoot on the cheap (the beach looks like a stage backdrop). The story lines ramble, scenes fizzle, the actors shout and weep embarrassingly; nuance is obliterated by sermonizing. In short, it’s another production from a filmmaker who’d rather expand his empire than hone his craft.”
(i'm no spell checking or grammar checkin this at all... so unless you want the job, shut up, lol)
Read more
WAS TYLER PERRY HATED ON OR WAS IT JUST HOW THE MARKET WORKS...?
After talking to a few friends about the new TP movie I decided to see what others had to say about it....The Internet Movie Database (IMDB.com) had a break down of a few choice reviews,
As is the usual case with Tyler Perry movies, Why Did I get Married Too? wasn’t screened for critics. It might as well have been, since the reviews turned out to have been not all that bad — and in some cases were pretty good. In her review in the New York Daily News, Elizabeth Weitzman wrote: “Perry doesn’t take any artistic risks; he’s got a formula, and sticks to it. The point, as always, is to remind viewers that they aren’t the only ones dealing with a straying spouse, a desperate job search, a grievous personal loss. He offers solace in familiarity, relief in low comedy, and comfort in platitudes about love and trust. And who are we to question his logic? The man has built an empire by giving his audience the emotional uplift it wants, critics be damned.” That’s pretty much the theme of a lot of reviews. Cheryl V. Jackson in the Chicago Sun-Times remarked, “There’s something oddly comforting about the familiarity of a Perry flick.” Wesley Morris in the Boston Globe indicated that he didn’t mind paying $11 to see the movie (instead of getting a free invitation from the studio). “I got $111 of drama. That’s Broadway value. But very little on the stage — not even one of Perry’s own plays — has had me sweating, crying, rolling my eyes, and sucking my teeth like this. The movie is 120 minutes of emotional Stairmaster. It’s so exhausting, in fact, that Perry himself has to climb off early, ending the movie without really finishing it.” On the other hand, Rafer Guzmán in Newsday concludes: “Once again, the movie feels amateurish, and not only because Perry tends to shoot on the cheap (the beach looks like a stage backdrop). The story lines ramble, scenes fizzle, the actors shout and weep embarrassingly; nuance is obliterated by sermonizing. In short, it’s another production from a filmmaker who’d rather expand his empire than hone his craft.”
Outside of the reviews I heard a lot of grapvine music saying that WDIGMT came in 2nd place in the box office because theaters only showed the flick in a few auditorium which paled in comparison to the amount of auditoriums that showed Clash of the Titans. Though this is just grapevine music, it does make me wonder who decides how many showing per theater...??
IF YOU NOTICED A DISPARTY FEEL FREE, LEAVE A COMMENT
IF YOU SAW IT AND WOULD LIKE TO CRITIQUE IT, LEAVE A COMMENT
IF YOU SIMPLY FEEL LIKE IT, LEAVE A COMMENT(i'm no spell checking or grammar checkin this at all... so unless you want the job, shut up, lol)
0
The Sprite Step Off Controversy
There is a big controversy brewing about how Coca-Cola reneged on a step team at the Sprite Step off..they gave them the Championship and later said thy have to share with some AKA's at another school...
Did i mention this team of steppers were white women/ladies!!!!
Read more
Did i mention this team of steppers were white women/ladies!!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
